The New EU Checklist Of Tax Havens: A lot Ado About Nothing – OpEd

By Jan Servaes

The European Finance Ministers not too long ago revised the European listing of tax havens. They added Antigua, Barbuda, Belize and Seychelles to the blacklist and eliminated the British Virgin Islands, the Bahamas, Costa Rica, Cayman Islands and the Marshall Islands. The listing consists of Russia, Panama, and different Caribbean states and territories, and 6 within the Pacific Ocean. The EU claims these nations both lacked tax data or did not ship on governance and transparency reforms commitments.

Oxfam claims that, until structural and efficient measures are taken, this listing is “complicated and ineffective”, i.e., “nonetheless as incomplete as ever”. Even the European Parliament strongly condemns the current removing of some nations from the listing and requires extra transparency and stricter standards for drawing up the listing. They state that “if we deal with others, we should additionally have a look at ourselves within the mirror. It’s not a reasonably image. EU nations are liable for 36% of tax havens.”

Oxfam desires stricter standards to blacklist nations with a zero or low tax price mechanically and to watch European nations with the identical drive as non-European nations. Oxfam additionally referred to as for the implementation of two long-announced purges: (a) a criterion of transparency relating to the placement and possession of the corporate and (b) the enlargement of the typical scope of the listing to incorporate extra nations such because the US and the UK.

Subsequently, Chiara Putaturo, tax professional at Oxfam EU, concludes: “That is one other train for nothing. The blacklist means nothing. It leaves nations with zero charges, such because the British Virgin Islands, untouched. Furthermore, it leaves nations such because the US and the UK, in addition to European tax havens akin to Luxembourg and Malta, alone. It’s a blow to the various residents struggling to make it to the top of the month, whereas the super-rich and profit-hungry multinationals are given a free go to keep away from their tax obligations.”

“The EU should lastly make good on its promise to completely evaluation the blacklist whether it is critical about tackling tax havens. International locations which are supposedly too large to be on the listing ought to not be spared. International locations that permit their firms to pay zero taxes or not disclose their homeowners ought to be blacklisted. The EU should not permit tax havens to proceed to develop inside its personal borders.

A code of conduct for ‘fairer tax competitors’

In July 2020, the European Fee requested the Code of Conduct Group (CCG), the Council physique liable for the EU listing of tax havens, to reform the standards of the EU listing of tax havens.

In Might 2021, the European Fee proposed the “Enterprise in Europe: Framework for Earnings Taxation (BEFIT)”, which incorporates guidelines for a typical tax base and the allocation of earnings between Member States primarily based on a system (formular distribution).

The BEFIT has been operational since September 12, 2023 and may change into one of many EU’s personal assets. It’s going to scale back tax compliance prices for giant firms, particularly these working in a couple of Member State, and make it simpler for nationwide authorities to find out what taxes are rightly due.

In July 2023, the Council referred to as on the Code of Conduct Group (CCG) to additional work on the inclusion of the helpful possession criterion and to broaden the geographical scope of the EU listing. It’s not but clear when the CCG will be capable to implement these reforms.


Oxfam, subsequently, calls on the Spanish and Belgian EU Presidencies to strengthen the standards for the blacklisting of tax havens within the EU and to enhance the governance and transparency of the Code of Conduct Group on Company Taxation.

Oxfam considers the efficient tax price of 15%, agreed at OECD degree and re-proposed by the European Fee, to be far too low. As well as, the OECD settlement and the EU proposal embrace a so-called ‘substance carve-out’, which permits firms to pay a decrease tax price than 15 % in nations the place they’ve many staff or materials belongings, akin to factories and equipment.

The OECD settlement allocates virtually all tax income from the worldwide minimal tax to ‘nations of residence’, for instance these nations the place multinational firms have their headquarters. That is often positioned in wealthy nations. Nevertheless, there is a chance for low-income nations to lift extra income from the minimal tax, by way of the Topic to Tax Rule (STR). An modification to the bilateral tax treaties is required to use this rule.

It is usually presently being mentioned within the US.


The 2021 OpenLux scandal revealed that Luxembourg hosts 55,000 offshore firms with no financial exercise. A number of are used for tax avoidance, evasion or cash laundering. Extra not too long ago, the so-called Pandora newspapers (a gaggle of about 17 newspapers together with Le Monde, the SüddeutscheZeitung, Le Soir, The Guardian, The Washington Publish, and many others.) uncovered how the wealthy use shell firms to pay much less taxes or disguise their monetary actions. The hidden wealth of a whole bunch of world leaders, politicians and billionaires had been uncovered in one of many largest monetary doc leaks ever.

Oxfam America can also be engaged on related actions and petitions: Tax the Wealthy.

Tax evasion, avoidance, fraud 

Many governments and corporations within the EU abuse tax practices akin to patent bins, analysis and growth tremendous deductions. and tax credit. Proof means that these practices, launched to help innovation, have as an alternative led to a brand new, damaging company tax ‘race to the underside’.

Dangerous company tax practices embrace aggressive tax guidelines that facilitate tax avoidance (akin to low withholding taxes on curiosity, royalties and dividends) and zero-tax or low-tax regimes that inherently entice revenue shifting (whether or not utilized to international or home firms), akin to patent bins (preferential tax therapy for earnings from intangible belongings akin to royalties) and tax exemptions (short-term discount or elimination of taxes on sure services or products).

In keeping with EU figures, 14 of the 27 EU nations had a patent field in 2019. All of them have a tax price for patents, software program and related intangible belongings beneath 15 % and half of them even beneath 10 %.

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) can even be steadily launched from 1 October 2023. The CBAM is a European regulation and a part of the Match for 55 bundle. This bundle goals to cut back greenhouse gasoline emissions by a minimum of 55% earlier than 2030. The goal of the CBAM is to forestall the danger of carbon leakage.

The CBAM is thus a value correction for imports into the EU of designated items, primarily based on CO2 emissions within the manufacturing course of outdoors the EU. It’s assumed that encouraging the discount of emissions by operators in third nations could scale back world carbon emissions.

Oxfam requires CBAM revenues for use for local weather motion and for the least developed nations to be exempt in order that the lowest-income nations usually are not disproportionately affected.

Three important steps

Oxfam’s Tax Briefing 2021 formulates three steps for the EU and Member States to deal with tax havens:

– 1 – Strengthen the EU’s listing of tax havens. Oxfam’s newest evaluation identifies 5 EU member states – Cyprus, Eire, Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands – as tax havens. The European Parliament has additionally referred to as these nations tax havens and the European Fee has famous that they favor aggressive tax planning.

The Code of Conduct Group, which is liable for blacklisting and assessing dangerous tax practices in EU nations, is being urged to evaluation the standards and its mandate.

– 2 – Improve company transparency. Public Nation by Nation Reporting (pCBCR) and helpful possession transparency are essential to forestall firms and people from evading their tax obligations. #OpenLux emphasizes the significance of transparency, as this could not have come to gentle with out public registers of helpful homeowners.

– 3 – Assess tax coverage on wealth. Particular person wealth and capital incomes are presently undertaxed in comparison with different sources of earnings akin to labor and consumption.

Billionaires’ wealth has elevated through the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas governments and unusual folks have been hit onerous by the well being and financial impression of COVID-19, it has in some methods been excellent news for billionaires, lots of whom have seen their wealth develop astronomically. A current Oxfam evaluation, the Inequality Virus, reveals how Europe’s 305 billionaires have grown fortunes by virtually €500 billion since March 2020 – sufficient to jot down a test for €11,092 to every of the poorest 10% of the Europeans.

To bridge this hole, Oxfam is looking for a rise in wealth and capital earnings taxes.

There must be a big effort by way of the non-public sector and philanthropists. “Billionaires’ wealth has elevated extra within the first 24 months of COVID-19 than in 23 years mixed. The overall wealth of the world’s billionaires now equals 13.9 % of world GDP. This can be a threefold improve (in comparison with 4.4 %) in 2000,” in response to Oxfam Worldwide’s 2022 report, titled “Cashing in on Ache”.

The 2023 Forbes billionaires listing tops the Belgian-domiciled Frenchman Bernard Arnault, president of Louis Vuitton, adopted by American billionaires akin to Tesla’s Elon Musk, Amazon proprietor Jeff Bezos; Larry Ellison of Oracle, Warren Buffett of Birkshire Hathaway, Invoice Gates, founding father of Microsoft; or Mark Zuckerberg of Fb. These billionaires, together with the greater than 2,000 billionaires around the globe, are rich sufficient to make substantial progress towards attaining the now stalled SDGs.

Combating a shedding battle?

Combating a shedding battle?

The Oxfam report, Survival of the Richest, reveals that the richest 1% have captured round 54% of all new wealth created up to now decade, and virtually two-thirds of all new wealth created since 2020. Tax havens have performed a job on this explosion of wealth as a result of they permit the wealthiest to keep away from their tax obligations.

* Jan Servaes is editor of the 2020 Handbook on Communication for Improvement and Social Change ( and co-editor of SDG18 Communication for All, Volumes 1 & 2, 2023 ([IDN-InDepthNews]